Micah Braswell vs Jake Van Emburgh Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Braswell vs J. Van Emburgh

Micah Braswell
USA
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
27
-
Height
-
740
C. Rank
0
411
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Jake Van Emburgh
USA
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
24
Age
27
-
Height
-
740
C. Rank
0
411
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Braswell 1 - 0 Emburgh
They have played 2 sets in total, with Micah Braswell winning 2 and Jake Van Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Micah Braswell and Jake Van Emburgh was at the M25 Dallas, 12-07-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Micah Braswell getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Braswell | 1 |
| Emburgh | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Dallas(07-12-23)
Micah Braswell
6
6
Jake Van Emburgh
3
1
M. Braswell vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.80% (61-41) | Career Total W/L | 49.18% (90-93) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Braswell vs J. V. Emburgh Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Micah Braswell has won 36.25% of points on their second serve, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 49.33%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Micah Braswell, in recent form, has won 46.02% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 49.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.71% and 23.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Micah Braswell has saved 45.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jake Van Emburgh has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Micah Braswell has won 61.54% of matches played (W/L 16/10), with Jake Van Emburgh winning 43.48% (W/L 10/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Micah Braswell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 24/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/5). Jake Van Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 62/55), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 13/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Micah Braswell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.29% of matches (W/L 9/5), where as Jake Van Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Micah Braswell winning 1 times and Jake Van Emburgh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Micah Braswell winning 2 and Jake Van Emburgh winning 0.
- The last match between Micah Braswell and Jake Van Emburgh was at the M25 Dallas, 12-07-2023, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Micah Braswell getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Micah Braswell has played against opponents with an average rank of 449.88 while Jake Van Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 170.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Micah Braswell has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jake Van Emburgh has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Micah Braswell has converted 22.62% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jake Van Emburgh has converted 20.00% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Micah Braswell vs Jake Van Emburgh Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Braswell vs J. V. Emburgh H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:14:0 | Average Match Time | 1:14:0 |
| 52% (25/48) | 1st Serve % | 57% (27/47) |
| 84% (21/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 30% (6/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 55% (26/47) | Return Points Win % | 31% (15/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Braswell 49%, Emburgh 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Braswell 52%, Emburgh 45%.
Break Points Saved %: Braswell 61%, Emburgh 54%.
M. Braswell Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 3-6 7-6(2) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 2-6 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(8) 6-4 | ||
J. V. Emburgh Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 2-6 6-4 10-6 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||

M. Braswell vs J. V. Emburgh Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.80% (61/41) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.18% (90/93) |
| 57.38% (136/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.89% (199/208) |
| 52.06% (1188/1094) | Games Win/Loss | 49.35% (1935/1986) |
| 60.66% (37/24) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.99% (62/55) |
| 0.00% (0/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.45% (15/18) |
| 66.67% (24/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 39.39% (13/20) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 373 | Aces Total | 354 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 257 | Total Double Faults | 258 |
| 1:37:24 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 427.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 283.74 |
| 58% (3715/6421) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3767/6474) |
| 69% (2556/3715) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2457/3767) |
| 49% (1338/2706) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1215/2707) |
| 42% (276/658) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (206/489) |
| 40% (2576/6375) | Return Points Win % | 37% (2271/6216) |
| 58.54% (24/17) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 60.66% (37/24) | Futures W/L | 49.45% (90/92) |
| 60% (59/98) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (90/183) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (16/31) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (23/45) |
| 57% (20/35) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (22/41) |
| 85% (60/51) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (87/77) |
| 15% (60/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (87/10) |
| 24% (42/10) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (96/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Wed, 03 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 12:30 PM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 06:30 AM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 12:00 PM
PredictionWed, 03 Dec, 11:00 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Panna Udvardy vs Diletta Cherubini Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Alycia Parks vs Gabriela Andrea Knutson Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Martina Colmegna vs Oleksandra Oliynykova Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Tatjana Maria vs Irene Burillo Prediction – WTA Quito Open – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

02 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Dalma Galfi vs Tereza Martincova Prediction – WTA W100 Dubai – 2nd December 2025 Best Bets

01 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Aliona Bolsova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
11:30
H2H 1-0
11:30
H2H 1-0
09:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0
12:30
H2H 0-0