Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Micah Braswell vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Braswell vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Micah Braswell vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Braswell 1 - 0 Emburgh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Braswell has won 50.85% of points on their second serve, while Emburgh has won 41.1%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Braswell, in recent form, has won 53.42% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 43.04%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.28% and 32.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Braswell has saved 65.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 45.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Braswell has won 69.57% of matches played (W/L 16/ 7), with Emburgh winning 44.9% (W/L 22/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Braswell has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 52/ 40), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Braswell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 69.57% of matches (W/L 16/ 7), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.9% of matches (W/L 22/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Braswell winning 1 times and Emburgh being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Braswell winning 2 and Emburgh winning 0. The last match between Braswell and Emburgh was at the M25 Dallas, 12-07-2023, First, I.hard with Micah Braswell getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Braswell and Emburgh have played a deciding set 0 times, with Braswell winning 0 times and Emburgh 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Braswell winning 0, and Emburgh 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Braswell has played against opponents with an average rank of 177.17 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 93.98.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Braswell has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Braswell has converted 49.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 38.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
737
Rank
737
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
58% (25-18)
Career Total W/L
52% (74-67)
90% (9-1)
YTD W/L
21% (4-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Micah Braswell vs Jake Van Emburgh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Braswell VS Emburgh
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Micah Braswell | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 4 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (25/48) | 57% (27/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 84% (21/25) | 56% (15/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 30% (6/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 55% (26/47) | 31% (15/48) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-1 |
Stats 
Micah Braswell
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Micah Braswell | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 90% (9/1) | 21% (4/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 82% (18/4) | 21% (8/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (129/96) | 39% (143/225) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 90% (9/1) | 17% (2/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 22 | 39 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 27 | 33 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:42 | 1:23:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.7 | 82.89 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (338/633) | 61% (587/969) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (229/338) | 59% (346/587) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (150/295) | 41% (157/382) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (35/71) | 38% (30/78) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (270/594) | 36% (365/1004) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 90% (9/1) | 21% (4/15) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 90% (9/10) | 21% (4/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (15/0) |
Micah Braswell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Eliot Spizzirri
Player
Micah Braswell
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
28 of
61)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Luis Carlos Alvarez Valdes
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Cannon Kingsley
67%
(
52 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
88
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(7) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Sebastian Gorzny
46%
(
32 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
53%
(
17 of
32)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Liam Draxl
49%
(
45 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Joshua Sheehy
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
40%
(
21 of
52)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Adhithya Ganesan
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
57)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
9
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Micah Braswell
Player
Pranav Kumar
53%
(
54 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
46%
(
22 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(5) 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Fabio Nestola
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Braswell Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Braswell are available here and Emburgh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
